10.6k
since 3 weeks, 3 days ago
4 of 4
Tip Reveddit Real-Time can notify you when your content is removed.
your account history
Tip Check if your account has any removed comments.
view my removed comments you are viewing a single comment's thread.
view all comments
That's why corporations need us to have/use AI companions. I still don't see a point in me having it. Let me decide if I want it.
I work in IT as support desk. I dread it when I hear the user say I used chatgpt or open AI. Hell, the company I work for tries everything to block that shit because of how bad it is.
Also work IT. It annoys me to no end when an end user goes "Well I consulted with ChatGPT and it said that what I'm suggesting can be done. Can you just make the changes?"
Nevermind the fact that the changes are either 1.) Doesn't work on the current hardware, requires massive buy-in and downtime to replace equipment or 2.) Is painfully insecure and the user just wants it done because it makes it convenient for them.
My favorite is to always bring up the age old triangle of "Security" "Cost" and "Convenience". Pick 2. The third is what will suffer. Low cost and Convenient? Then it sure as hell ain't secure. Remember, the S in IoT stands for Security.
I often wonder about that. Trying to do this or that or whatever, on my phone or Windows or Word, I google and the directions don't work for the current version, because Apple and Microsoft like to take the same functions and hide them or shuffle them around, change the wording of the menus, etc.
How well can AI tell from reading 20 years of help posts and manuals what the correct answer is for the most current version of any particular software? The older version probably has a lot more posts about the old process of doing the same thing, if it's gauging "correct" by number of posts that agree.
It can't. ChatGPT and the like are not thinking about things and finding the correct answer, they're predicting the most statistically likely word to follow on from what have been previously output. As you say given a larger number of training samples for a given thing it might be more likely to output a somewhat correct answer but it just as easily might not.