LOADING: An error occurred. Update Chrome, try Firefox, or visit this post for more details.

⚠️Reddit changed how removals work, which breaks Reveddit's website. Install the extension to track removed content:Add to chromeAdd to firefoxWhat changed?
✖︎
about reveddit
⚙F.A.Q.add-ons
r/
status
copy sharelink
[+] show filters
45.1k
Apollo dev posts backend code to Git to disprove Reddit’s claims of scrapping and inefficiency(github.com)
submitted 2 years, 7 months ago by GhostalMedia to /r/programming (6.8m)
2375 commentsredditother-discussions (10+)subreddit-indexmessage modsop-focus domain-index
since 2 years, 7 months ago
3 of 3

Tip Reveddit Real-Time can notify you when your content is removed.

your account history
(check your username's removed content. why?)
Tip Check if your account has any removed comments.
view my removed comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread.
view all comments
[–][deleted]2 points2 years, 7 months ago

If this site became like 30% bots pretending to offer engagement in the comment sections, that would be a hotly public decision, and people would lose all trust in authentic discussion on this website, which is arguably what the entire site's foundation is built on, even stronger than the content aggregation itself.

If bots are driving the discussion on this website, then who is actually is giving these filthy executives ad views? It just sounds like a ponzi scheme to me. Offering companies a chance to advertise on a platform built on fake engagement driven by bots. It doesn't provide any value to advertisers. I don't get it.

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)as-of
[–]Xarthys2 points2 years, 7 months ago

I don't have that much insight, but we already have non-authentic discussions across a wide spectrum of subs, and a plethora of bots karma farming by submitting tons of stuff each day. You already can't tell if it's a bot you are talking to, especially if ChatGPT etc. has been used to create a reply.

Only few people are bothered by it because it simply provides consumable content to everyone's liking. At the end of the day, it's just stuff to look at and maybe spend a few minutes typing a reply. And as long as content is available, value is being generated because people will continue to consume content, regardless of its origin.

At least, that's the only scenario that makes sense to me (somewhat). Otherwise, why continously erode the very foundation that is reddit, its community? Again and again, we have seen changes being made that are not in the interests of users. Stuff like that doesn't just happen because VCs are forcing it, it's because there is an internal roadmap and a long-term vision.

Sure, maybe spez just wants to cash out and let reddit die, but that would be absolutely retarded, considering the true potential of this site (which is being squandered already). If they really wanted to turn reddit into the most popular community driven platform, would they really make all these decisions in the first place?

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]SasquatchButterpants1 point2 years, 7 months ago

To add to this, I work in online journalism in a mid sized site. I’ve had to have the discussion about Chat GPT plenty of times. The scary thing is that Reddit could have 10 prompt engineers with a background in writing of any stripe and those engineers could run 50-100 bots worth of content each. Making it even harder to distinguish who is real and who isn’t.

permalinkparentcontextauthor-focusas-ofpreserve
r/revedditremoved.substack.com
🚨 NEWS 🚨
✖︎

Important: Reddit Changed How Removals Work

A recent Reddit update makes mod-removed content disappear from profile pages, which breaks Reveddit's website.

Install the browser extension to receive removal alerts.

Add to chromeAdd to firefox

What changed?

r/revedditremoved.substack.com