LOADING: An error occurred. Update Chrome, try Firefox, or visit this post for more details.

⚠️Reddit changed how removals work, which breaks Reveddit's website. Install the extension to track removed content:Add to chromeAdd to firefoxWhat changed?
✖︎
about reveddit
⚙F.A.Q.add-ons
r/
status
copy sharelink
[+] show filters
3957
💩shitpost[ Removed by moderator ](i.redd.it)
submitted 2 months ago by skippydingelchaIk to /r/PsycheOrSike (32.4k)
[removed] mod/auto
1149 commentsredditother-discussions (2+)subreddit-indexmessage modsop-focus domain-index
since 1 month, 4 weeks ago
13 of 13

Tip Reveddit Real-Time can notify you when your content is removed.

your account history
(check your username's removed content. why?)
Tip Check if your account has any removed comments.
view my removed comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread.
view all comments
[–]Throw3234561 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

The correct alternative would be to use the noun 'men' as a subject.

It's not rocket science ;)

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (2)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Square-Awareness-8851 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

Just saw you’re a proudly self-proclaimed sexist. Are you baiting me into (and losing) this stupid semantics debate because you couldn’t address my original point but the juvenile rage inside you caused you to need to find something to reply to? And arguing over which pronoun I should use is what you landed on?

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Throw3234561 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

Your "original point" was nebulous enough that half a dozen people commented on it. You would have to clarify your semantics in this case before we could debate anything.

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Square-Awareness-8851 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

And yet every person commenting on it had the same issue: thinking I’m talking about them specifically. It’s not a misunderstanding, it’s emotional immaturity that makes you think this in this context. Again, when people criticize their own countrymen (or even fandoms for that matter) for their behavior, they use “we” and nobody feels the need to butt in with “but I don’t do that!”

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Throw3234561 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

In your other post, you've claimed men share a responsibility. That would include me, and presumably the other people questioning why this would be the case. There doesn't seem to be a clear reason why we would be responsible.

It would be like if I said you and I are now collectively responsible for the cost of the Taco Bell I just ordered, and justified this by saying: "Well, we're both men!". You might question why you're included in this particular instance; posit that, actually, your gender doesn't demonstrate why you would be responsible for this; argue that, as you didn't order the Taco Bell, it's not really your responsibility at all.

So why am I lumped into yours?

I'd also make a point of noting that your smugness in all of this is bizarre. You seem to think you're making an argument on par with the Cartesian first principle, but in reality, you're a flailing retard who can barely string a sentence together, let alone a coherent argument. Whatever you reply with, I bet money that if I formalized it, it would not demonstrate a collective responsibility.

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Square-Awareness-8851 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

“The Cartesian First Principle” is “I think therefore I am”, which is really one of the most if not the most basic philosophy 101 arguments. Was that you trying to sound smart?

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Throw3234561 point1 month, 4 weeks ago* (edited 9 minutes after)

This is like saying "Newton's first law is basic physics". That doesn't make the Principia less profound, or Newton dumb. You are not Newton. You are not Descartes. You are not putting forward a profound argument. You are not even able to put forward an argument at all, it seems.

Edit to say you should have left your original reply in. It was better to play this all off as a low effort troll, IMO.

permalinkparentcontextauthor-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Square-Awareness-8851 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

Both are fine, and I gave you an example as to why. You didn’t address it

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Throw3234561 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

Your example implies a collective responsibility. It actually undermines your point.

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Square-Awareness-8851 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

We do share a collective responsibility in this case. Even if not every man is doing stuff like this. You’re not very bright

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Throw3234561 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

Do women also have a responsibility here?

If not, why not? In either case, can you demonstrate how I am responsible for this, somehow?

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Square-Awareness-8851 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

Members of a class that is harming another through social structures share collective responsibility in removing or at least not reinforcing that structure.

You’re responsible but only in the sense that you have a responsibility to eliminate and not reinforce an unfair social structure that benefits you. You seem to be really fixated in the “I don’t do this” aspect of the argument and less in the societal one. It’s really not a big deal to admit that society benefits some times of people in some unfair ways and we benefit from that sometimes (any group btw, not just men). I’m not pointing a finger accusing you of doing something bad but you seem to think I am

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]Throw3234561 point1 month, 4 weeks ago

>Members of a class that is harming another through social structures share collective responsibility in removing or at least not reinforcing that structure.

Yeah, I understand you think this, but why? Why do I have that responsibility? Can you provide an argument?

>You seem to be really fixated in the “I don’t do this” aspec

I'm asking you a relatively simple question: Why do you think I have this responsibility? Can you demonstrate it, or is it just your whimsy? If it's just your whimsy, well, I think you have the responsibility to lick my balls. What now?

permalinkparentcontextauthor-focusas-ofpreserve
r/revedditremoved.substack.com
🚨 NEWS 🚨
✖︎

Important: Reddit Changed How Removals Work

A recent Reddit update makes mod-removed content disappear from profile pages, which breaks Reveddit's website.

Install the browser extension to receive removal alerts.

Add to chromeAdd to firefox

What changed?

r/revedditremoved.substack.com