LOADING: An error occurred. Update Chrome, try Firefox, or visit this post for more details.

⚠️Reddit changed how removals work, which breaks Reveddit's website. Install the extension to track removed content:Add to chromeAdd to firefoxWhat changed?
✖︎
about reveddit
⚙F.A.Q.add-ons
r/
status
copy sharelink
[+] show filters
262
Weaponized reporting: what we’re seeing and what we’re doing(self.ModSupport)
submitted 6 years ago by worstnerdReddit Admin: Safety to /r/ModSupport (175.5k)
564 commentsredditother-discussions (2+)subreddit-indexmessage modsop-focus

Hey all,

We wanted to follow up on [last week’s post](https://www.reddit.com/r/ModSupport/comments/...

... view full text

since 6 years ago
5 of 5

Tip Reveddit Real-Time can notify you when your content is removed.

your account history
(check your username's removed content. why?)
Tip Check if your account has any removed comments.
view my removed comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread.
view all comments
[–][deleted]11 points6 years ago

A bug reaching production that results in the user sending in a report being suspended, rather than the reported user, is not defensible. Support agents closing suspension appeals with no response is not defensible. Suspensions being issued for months and years old comments is not defensible. All of these are the result of failures at the process level. These things went inadequately vetted to an utterly careless degree.

So no - it is perfectly productive to repeatedly point out that what caused their problems comes from a deeper level than the band-aids they keep telling us about. We are not talking about bugs and bad decisions surrounding edge cases. We are talking about screwups at a very basic and fundamental level, and it is not appropriate to handwave them by saying "nO sYsTeM iS pErFeCt".

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (2)as-of
[–]xiongchiamiov3 points6 years ago

Even when you have multiple series of checks in place, mistakes still happen. Let's also keep in mind that reddit is a social media site, not an aviation software company, and so they should very intentionally avoid many layers of checks in order to maintain speed of change (I think most people here would agree that we want changes quicker than they're happening).

I'm not saying that shipping bugs is not bad, but you're presenting things in a very black and white manner, and even when your entire job is about reliability, as mine is, the reality is that more reliability is not always a good thing and there's a lot of context and nuance to every discussion.

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–][deleted]4 points6 years ago

What you said is correct as a broad philosophy. I do not purport to write code which is free of all possible bugs. But it does not apply to these specific instances.

A software development pipeline that allows a bug of the kind and magnitude of "people who report can get banned instead of people who were reported" to reach production is fundamentally broken. That Reddit is not developing aviation software is not an appropriate hand-waving for the level of negligence it takes for that bug to be missed at every possible level. I am presenting this in a black and white manner because these specific instances are black and white. There's no nuance.

many layers of checks

The layers of checks I described are industry standard for professional software development - Peer review, automated testing, human QA testing. This is incredibly basic, and ultimately they facilitate faster iteration by reducing the amount of developer time that has to be allocated to fixing bugs that reach production, where they have greater impact. Google does these things. Facebook does these things. Rinky dink companies with 4 person dev teams I've worked for do these things.

permalinkparentcontextas-of
[–]Isentrope-1 points6 years ago

I’ve reported hundreds of things with the report feature and haven’t been banned accidentally before. A comod of mine did but it was reversed in very short order. You are making these issues out to be far more prevalent and damaging than they are. I do wish the admins would give us more channels of communication, but your experience with them is really not like my own. We’ve always been able to chat with them about technical issues that impeded our moderation. It hasn’t always been a very fast turnaround, but they aren’t just stonewalling on every issue or error either as you seem to intimate. It’s trivially easy to complain that something isn’t working well, especially if you didn’t like it in the first place. But whether you like it or not, it’s unproductive to think that complaining in every thread about this system and making every error an unforgivable red line is doing anything to advance that position. It’s not helpful for trying to get them to care about your concerns, and it’s definitely not helpful for the rest of the people who mod who would like the admins to communicate with us more.

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–]maybesaydie3 points6 years ago

I have never gotten any response at all about my 3 day suspension from May of last year despite many messages, sending relevant links to one admin or another and begging for an explanation in posts such as this. Yes, it may be an uncommon problem but the lack of any sort of response at all speaks to reddit's contempt for the people who volunteer to keep the site from turning into voat. It's disheartening.

permalinkparentcontextauthor-focusas-ofpreserve
r/revedditremoved.substack.com
🚨 NEWS 🚨
✖︎

Important: Reddit Changed How Removals Work

A recent Reddit update makes mod-removed content disappear from profile pages, which breaks Reveddit's website.

Install the browser extension to receive removal alerts.

Add to chromeAdd to firefox

What changed?

r/revedditremoved.substack.com