3279
QuestionWhy did Yugoslavia balkanize while India did not?(i.redd.it)
submitted 1 week, 2 days ago* (edited 22 minutes after) by Outrageous-Client903 to /r/geography (1.4m)
After independence, Yugoslavia eventually broke apart along ethnic lines, whereas India despite bein...
since 1 week, 2 days ago
19 of 19
Tip Reveddit Real-Time can notify you when your content is removed.
your account history
Tip Check if your account has any removed comments.
view my removed comments you are viewing a single comment's thread.
view all comments


How would a conflict make it easier to keep a colony? Surely conflict would be the last thing you want in a colony?
people fight each other rather than against british - easier control
That seems like something that would work in the short term, but backfire in the long term.
They lost India.
internal conflict makes people fight each other than realise who are actually the real villains.
Divide and Rule
nah the broken unity between the Muslims and the Hindus is what the the British exploited. If they were united the threat for independence would be far greater but instead there was infighting
Divide and conquer - Wikipedia
It's pretty common strategy that used by colonial empire
Consider the age old method of devide and conquer, used globally throughout history. Make your enemies fight and weaken each other, then you take the spoils with comparative ease.
If they are in conflict with each other, they aren’t united for a conflict with you. It’s divide and conquer. Sure you’d prefer general peace but if they’re gearing up for something against you, splitting them up and pitting them against each other so they weaken themselves and you can hopefully deal with each in turn is the next best thing.
The Indian revolts against the British were put down by other Indians. The British conquest of India was done primarily by Indian mercenaries under the British known as sepoys, not white British troops. India had long running religious and ethnic feuds that the British took advantage of so they’d fight amongst each instead of the British.
The Indian sepoys had 2 options.
1) Starve and die
2) Obey their orders
Yes, but that isn't covering the nuance of why some groups became allied with the British, the history of various Princely states and their alliances and more.
The British did not treat the revolters nicely. Read up on how they treated the revolters of the first war of independence in 1857. The british subjected the sepoys to utterly horrific punishment.
After the Indian states lost the war, the remaining kings and sepoys didn't have the guts to revolt en mass again.
I never said otherwise. There is just more nuance to the situation than the 2 bullet points you made.
Divide and Conquer has literally been an imperialist tactic for centuries.
All of the British colonial forces in India was made up of Indians with few British officers in the top. The British gave preferential treatment to the ethnicities that they deemed loyal to the British crown and this created animosity. For example the British solidified the caste system which had already existed in India for centuries but in practice was very nuanced, the mordern day caste understanding in India and the West comes from the British interpretation and oversmiplification of the system which was they institutionalised by the British(Caste based discrimination existed before the British but it worsened under them). So, Hindus fought among themselves when it comes to caste. Other example will be the ethnic Punjabis, which led to the formation of Pakistan. The Bengalis betrayed the British in the First War for Independence in 1857, the ethnic Punjabis and Rajputs came to the aid of the British as most of them did not like the idea of the Mughal Emperor being reinstated by the rebeling forces. After crushing the rebellion the British only exclusively recurited from the regions that favoured the British and they created a theory call the "Martial race theory" which gave preferencital treatment to some ethnicities which they considered superior in combat and will not question the orders, bascially they wanted to have ethnic groups that will not betray them again. That is also the reason Pakistan got so much political momentum as a close to half of the British Indian forces were ethnic Punjabis which led to Punjabis who are majority muslims asking for a seperate state, Pakistani population is about 54% ethnic Punjabi and Punjabis in India represent around 2% of the Indian population.
Majorly the British incited conflicts by giving preferential treatment to certain ethnicities or castes which created animosity and distrust in the society.