LOADING: An error occurred. Update Chrome, try Firefox, or visit this post for more details.

⚠️Reddit changed how removals work, which breaks Reveddit's website. Install the extension to track removed content:Add to chromeAdd to firefoxWhat changed?
✖︎
about reveddit
⚙F.A.Q.add-ons
r/
status
copy sharelink
[+] show filters
370
[deleted by user]()
submitted 5 months, 2 weeks ago by [deleted] to /r/MensRights (374.7k)
[deleted] by mod & user
85 commentsredditother-discussionssubreddit-indexmessage modsdomain-index
since 5 months, 2 weeks ago
13 of 13

Tip Reveddit Real-Time can notify you when your content is removed.

your account history
(check your username's removed content. why?)
Tip Check if your account has any removed comments.
view my removed comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread.
view all comments
[–]omicron02212 points5 months, 2 weeks ago

"This restaurant doesn't serve black people, and this restaurant forces black people to eat in a separate (but equal) section... Well, why don't people who are upset about it start their own restaurant that discriminates against white people?"

<- This is how fucking stupid you sound. Either discrimination is bad (hint: it is), and shouldn't be allowed, or it isn't.

Hell - you don't even have to go with the historical restaurant example. What if we just changed this current story to:

"Uber has added a new filter that allows people to specify a preference to not have black drivers pick them up"

You're saying you're totally cool with that, right? If people don't like that, they should just start their own Uber, right?

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–][deleted]-7 points5 months, 2 weeks ago

You're saying you're totally cool with that, right? If people don't like that, they should just start their own Uber, right?

Yes, freedom of association is a fundamental human right. Nobody should be forced to transact with someone tbey wish not to. How is your argument any different from the feminist argument that private employers should be forced to pay men and women equally?

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (2)as-of
[–]Reversegiraffe18 points5 months, 2 weeks ago

Nobody should be forced to transact with someone they wish not to.

Not the guy you are talking to but you do realize that goes against the civil rights rights act of 1964 right? So are you saying it's not something we should lean on?

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–][deleted]0 points5 months, 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I want that law abolished

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)as-of
[–]Reversegiraffe11 point5 months, 2 weeks ago

Just saw your post history and see you think its one of the most wretched pieces of legislation in history. Ok so want you to go back in time and burn it. We would be back to the 1950s where women weren't even allowed in many fields. Let alone own homes or have any shred of independence. That's your point of view from what it looks like lol

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–][deleted]1 point5 months, 2 weeks ago

Which fields would women be disallowed from if that law was repealed? Is there not a single employer in that field that wants to hire women?

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)as-of
[–]Reversegiraffe12 points5 months, 2 weeks ago* (edited 3 minutes after)

It's not about being repealed numbnuts or should I say numbovaries. You can't simultaneously extract a bill's benefits and then say it's shit. If you think it's wretched, it would have never happened and we'd be on a completely differrent timeline than what are now. It's like someone saying "It's ok when I get welfare but not other people" and doesn't hold a shred of logical consitency.

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
[–][deleted]0 points5 months, 2 weeks ago

It's not about being repealed numbnuts or should I say numbovaries

Do you think I'm a woman? I'm not

You can't simultaneously extract a bill's benefits and then say it's shit

What makes you think I've benefited from this bill? The people who "benefit" from the bill are those employers wanted to discrimimate against them but were forbidden from doing so. What makes you think my employer wants to discrimimate against me?

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (2)as-of
[–]Reversegiraffe12 points5 months, 2 weeks ago

You came here to be some turbo libertarian in response to men's discrimination issues. I don't see a shred of you doing the same in response to female ones like the equal pay they complain so much about. You're completely quiet on that. Why don't you go to the sub twoxchromosomes and tell the women the creepy men staring at them are just exercising their right to avert their gaze where they want? Since you're all about freedom. But no you won't and you'll just stay here.

permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)author-focusas-ofpreserve
continue this thread⟶
[–][deleted]1 point5 months, 2 weeks ago
[removed] mod/auto

[removed] content loading...

(check your username's removed content. why?)
spin
permalinkparentcontexthide replies (1)as-ofmessage mods
continue this thread⟶
[–]Itsdickyv1 point5 months, 2 weeks ago

The fundamental flaw in that position is that nobody is forced to transact at all. It’s like suggesting KFC should be forced to sell burgers, because people shouldn’t be forced to eat chicken…

permalinkparentcontextauthor-focusas-ofpreserve
r/revedditremoved.substack.com
🚨 NEWS 🚨
✖︎

Important: Reddit Changed How Removals Work

A recent Reddit update makes mod-removed content disappear from profile pages, which breaks Reveddit's website.

Install the browser extension to receive removal alerts.

Add to chromeAdd to firefox

What changed?

r/revedditremoved.substack.com